Democratic campain

Those who insist on crossing their fingers and voting for Hillary in 2008 obviously harbor a desire to maitain a dynastic line of succession by continuing the patern of Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton. Perhaps we need to enact a constitutional amendment that limits the highest office to the chaotic oligarchy. After all, why take a chance with bold, sweeping [CHANGE], when we can settle for the warmth and security of the same old comfortable train wreck? We could save billions by eliminating endless campaigns, redundant debates and the rediculous voting contest that we conduct every four years. This nonstop 24/7 election cycle merry-go-round is making the nation nauseous. Hillary will reign until 2017 when, assuming we survive, Jeb Bush will take the helm. Old man Jeb can turn it over to Chelsea Clinton in 2025, and by 2033, we'll need to choose from a slew of rising Bushes. Ideally, both clans serving together while alternating the Vice-President's slot would be most efficient. In the event of a lineage gap, we can revert to the old method, but certainly there will be no shortage of aspirants. The amount of time and money spared would be enormous, and in fairness, the GOP and the Dems can take turns being happy and arrogant, or angry and bitter. The only danger to this system would be if a Bush and Clinton were to ever marry. This apocalyptic union may produce offspring who could create the advent of a major third party. In regard to that possibility, I propose that we keep the chain alive.

Hillary is now calling herself another Rocky Balboa.Where does she come up with this stuff? If she thinks this is what the American people need for the leader of our great country I think she's been hit in the head toooo many times.

Cheer up Anton, Thursday [the 3rd] is Food Stamp day, isn't it?? Six-shooter, you are "right on", the politicians all are full of BS!! They'll tell the "minority" voters anything, and promise them "freebies" all day long, just to get the vote, when in fact they and their money, could care less about the [minorities]. One big problem we have is that the Senators are elected for SIX years! That's way too long to put up with their BS! I think McCain will pick [if he is wise] Mitt Romney as his VP. Talk about a balanced ticket. But McCain will probably cave in to the "minority" BS and either pick a woman or a black!! Sure to lose then!!!!! But of course he could cover ALL bases and pick Condi Rice! Al Gore the 2x4?? Everyone please give it up. I have been watching the polls, and even the Dem's don't want him anywhere around. But, he could get the sympathy vote, and Obama, could bring in the minorities, who don't have a clue about what this election means, other than a few "promised" Guvment give-a-ways! I don't get the criticism of McCain, because he "reaches across the aisle". If he was a party line voter, they would say that he is afraid to "reach to the other side", you know, [they] the Demonrats!! So, come on you liberals, you can't have it both ways. And some of you GOP'ers are a bit confused on what you want. ALL I know is that GW Bush will be standing in front of Mt Rushmore next year, so that his protrait can be chiseled next to the other fine Presidents. Hopefully they will have room for Reagan AND GW!!!! I think Anton has a bad case of "Cabin Fever"!!!!