<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>International Falls Daily Journal - Should the City turn the Burner Road over to Boise? - Comments</title>
 <link>http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com/+news/polls/should-city-turn-burner-road-over-boise-2126</link>
 <description>Comments for &quot;Should the City turn the Burner Road over to Boise?&quot;</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Doorsman 54----first of all</title>
 <link>http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com/+news/polls/should-city-turn-burner-road-over-boise-2126#comment-8217</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Doorsman 54----first of all the stupidity is not in the poll. It&#039;s just a poll. The stupidity lies in the &quot;3 power brokers&quot; that allowed this &quot;tragic un-comedy&quot;to go on. If they had all their ducks in a row they would have known this and all this time and money would never have been wasted. Wow this is what Boise has for a power broker and this is what we have for our county power brokers? What a tragic joke. By the way what is wrong in listening to any concerned citizen opinion (not fear) just as you have done here?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 09:22:17 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>six-shooter</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8217 at http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>First of all it is a stupid</title>
 <link>http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com/+news/polls/should-city-turn-burner-road-over-boise-2126#comment-8216</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;First of all it is a stupid poll because it seems the city should have never been involved in this process as MNDOT, the county and Mr. Anderson say the Burner Road is not the cities, it never was and it never will be, so why did the city have to be a partner in this tragic un-comedy(SP?), other than listening and reacting to concerned citizens and their fears? The city thought it had a role but it really doesn&#039;t other than rubber stamping the decision of the  three mentioned real power brokers in this thread.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 08:42:08 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Doorsman 54</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 8216 at http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Your poll may be a bit</title>
 <link>http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com/+news/polls/should-city-turn-burner-road-over-boise-2126#comment-1302</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Your poll may be a bit misleading since you don&#039;t offer enough choices. My vote was for yes, but your poll forced me to say I don&#039;t use the road while in reality I DO use the road. I&#039;m sure there are people out there who would also vote no and Don&#039;t use the road. You should have just left the choices as Yes, No and Maybe, I need more info.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;br class=&quot;clear&quot; /&gt;</description>
 <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2007 07:22:47 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Blackbay</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">comment 1302 at http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Should the City turn the Burner Road over to Boise?</title>
 <link>http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com/+news/polls/should-city-turn-burner-road-over-boise-2126</link>
 <description>* Yes, I don&#039;t use that road anyway.\n* No, I use that road.\n* Maybe, I need more information.\n</description>
 <comments>http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com/+news/polls/should-city-turn-burner-road-over-boise-2126#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com/polls">Polls</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 10:32:26 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Journal Staff</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">2126 at http://www.ifallsdailyjournal.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
