Revving the economy will take creativity, and a cash for clunkers program fits the bill.
The U.S. House Tuesday approved the Consumer Assistance to Recycle and Save Act, known as the cash for clunkers program. The legislation is intended to boost auto sales and save jobs by providing cash incentives for drivers to exchange their old gas guzzlers for new vehicles with better gas mileage. A similar bill is moving through the U.S. Senate.
The House bill would provide vouchers worth $3,500 if car owners traded in a vehicle getting 18 miles per gallon or less for one getting at least 22 mpg. The value of the voucher would grow to $4,500 if the mileage of the new car is 10 mpg higher than the old vehicle. A similar approach is taken with sport utility vehicles, pickups and minivans.
The program would achieve multiple goals that are important to our nation’s recovery from this recession. The legislation would help the nation reduce greenhouse gases, decrease the country’s dependence on foreign oil and save jobs in the struggling auto industry.
In addition, the program would help drivers save money at the gas pumps. The Department of Energy estimates that a motorist driving 15,000 miles a year, purchasing gas at $2.34 a gallon, would save $780 a year by switching from a car getting 18 miles per gallon to one that gets 30 mpg.
And while we agree that the program makes sense, it won’t play a role in some American’s lives, should it become reality. People who have already lost their jobs likely see no way to finance a new car, regardless of the incentives.
We also believe that including an incentive for purchasing used vehicles may have been a good way to encourage Americans to trade in their very old cars for a more fuel efficient used car.
The cash for clunkers idea is a good example of how our nation can jerk ourselves out of this recession while still meeting goals important to our nation.


60% the cars that are...
Back to page top60% the cars that are currently donated to charity will now be eligible for a $3500 or $4500 voucher under the cash for clunkers program. Since the tax deduction for donating a car is only $500 or what the car sells charities won't be able to compete with the program and charitable car donation will end. A better idea is to just change the amount a person can deduct for donating their car back to the book value. That way every car is eligible, the government doesn't have to spend $4 million of our dollars giving away vouchers and trying to administer a program that is way too convoluted!
Anyone having a "gas...
Back to page topAnyone having a "gas guzzling" 55, 56 or 57 Chevy pls email me and I will give you $7,500 for it, and you can go buy one of these energy efficient midget cars. And when I meet you head on with my 57 Chevy or Olds, all I can say is, "GOOD LUCK"!!!!
By the way, I agree 100% with "karenc's" comments above. I love it when "The Chosen One's" Administration throws out these rediculous programs without giving someone 24 hrs to read it.
I can't wait until they come after my gas guzzler RV. But, it probably gets better mileage than some of your 4WD pickemup trucks Y'all have up there. Has anyone ever thought of reducing the amount of miles they actually drive?? I tried it, and I reduced my gas bill by 25%. Most Americans (including me) could use some walking, etc.... But, take a drive on a Sunday afternoon and see how congested the roads are. It's hard to believe we have a "hurting economy"! Sure fooled me.....
I wonder who the "O" Admin "trade in Czar" is?? Good job for Al Franken.
I also find myself agreeing...
Back to page topI also find myself agreeing with karenc and GASP roj that the donation system is a good one and should be encouraged and not undercut by this public sector program. A few years ago, I drove a pretty good but irritating Corsica to a donation lot and was given a voucher for market value. Then the government came in and reduced that deduction the next year-- I believe it was that big government president, GWB.
Now our government seems to want to get into the rebate business. If I go out to trade an American-made gas guzzler with all its mechanical problems for a KIA, I am helping put most transmission repair shops out of business and not really helping bring back Chrysler or GM. The government can't demand that the rebate go for US cars only as that is a violation of World Trade Organization policy, so the whole thing becomes a shot in the dark.
I think that some of these band-aids are going to create wounds in spots that the band-aids were not placed. That is what we mean by unintended consequences.