News, sports, politics, blogs and forums for International Falls, Minnesota • (218) 285-7411

International Falls, Minnesota

Click to Login
No account? Sign up!

Advertising

Advertising

Voyageurs National Park Day at the Capitol: Promoting the park, By KATIE KOLT HALL, Staff Writer


» Read similar stories filed under:

Local officials travel to Washington D.C. to support park, area projects

Officials say last Wednesday’s Voyageurs National Park Day at the Capitol was, in some ways, symbolic of the changing relationship between the park and its gateway communities.

Representatives from Koochiching County, St. Louis County, the city of International Falls, the park, and the Voyageurs National Park Association traveled to Washington, D.C. to discuss the park with federal officials.

Falls Mayor Shawn Mason said that federal officials were relieved to see the group travel and speak as one unit, promoting the same goal.

“Personally, I’m proud of that accomplishment, too,” Mason said.

Monday night, she and Councilor Tim “Chopper” McBride recounted the trip to the International Falls City Council.

VNP Superintendent Mike Ward called the event a chance to “let the congressional delegates know the past is behind us now ... We’re all on the same page with what is best for the communities and the park.”

“Ten years to be on the same page would have been unheard of,” said Wade Pavleck, Koochiching County commissioner. In a note repeated by other local officials, Pavleck said former VNP superintendent Kate Miller and current superintendent Mike Ward were instrumental in bridging relations between the park and local governments.

“Ten years ago it was like the Sunnis and the Shiites, it never would have happened,” said International Falls City Councilor Tim “Chopper” McBride. “(Those feelings) are not gone, but it’s healing.”

McBride said that U.S. Rep. Jim Oberstar had challenged community and park leaders years ago to find common ground and resolve lingering issues. McBride said that at one point during the meetings, Oberstar turned to him and said, “It happened, it worked.” The goal had been met.

The purpose of VNP Day at the Capitol was to update congressional delegates and their staffs on the successes and challenges in the park, and to discuss the importance of federal backing on certain projects.

Ward explained that it was “respectful” for the local contingent to visit D.C. to promote the park, rather than expect or wait for federal officials to visit Borderland.

“We’re not just sitting in Minnesota telling them what we need,” he said.

VNP Day included briefings with the representatives and staffs, followed by an evening event. The dinner was complete with a walleye fish fry, described by Mason as the type of shorelunch one would expect in Borderland.

And although Washington was abuzz with what is called “March madness” in the Capitol, the event was well attended by influential decision makers and their top staffs, local officials report.

“It was a busy day, a busy time in Washington,” said Andy Burmeister, who represented St. Louis County on the trip and helped set up the event. “It was not an easy thing to do. To get that many staff in one room speaks volumes.”

Burmeister works for Lockridge Grindal Mauen PLLP law firm out of Minneapolis and does work in Washington.

Oberstar has long been a proponent of the national park, and many say was influential in making the VNP Day happen.

Advertisement. Article continues below.

“He came to talk about his love for the park,” Burmeister said.

Ward said there were four main topics on the park’s promotional agenda: a two-county clean water sewer project, VNPA land acquisition from willing sellers within the park boundaries, the Voyageurs Heritage Center and marketing group Destination VNP.

In addition to those cooperative agendas, members of the group were also able to meet with federal representatives on other topics of local concern.

For example, Pavleck spoke on behalf of the Renewable Energy Clean Air Project plasma gasification facility to seniors members of House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s staff.

Pavleck proposed making RECAP a federal pilot project, noting that it fit with the president’s agenda of renewable energy projects. He said that making RECAP a pilot project would take some responsibility of the project off local taxpayers and government if it was federally funded.

“They were open to it ... and were willing to hear more,” Pavleck said.

Another project that Pavleck said he discussed with federal officials is the joint sewer project between Koochiching and St. Louis counties, the goal of which is to improve water quality in the nation’s only water-based park.

“I feel really good about it,” Pavleck said. “Clearly, this project has merit at the federal level. ... Clean water is critical in the park’s future.”

The project would extend sewer service to areas in the park basin currently not being served.

“The park is one to be cherished and protected for years to come,” Mason said, adding that the economic impact that the park provides neighboring communities such as the Falls is to be cultivated, as well.

McBride spoke about the North Koochiching Sanitary Sewer District. He said that one discussion flowed into the next and the information was well presented and well received.

Mason said that several federal officials were surprised that the port of Ranier is the second busiest rail port of entry in the United States (behind Detroit) and that a foreign trade zone was located in the area. Facts like these, she said, help promote and expand interest in the area.

Burmeister noted that several members of the congressional delegation were surprised to hear that Voyageurs is the nation’s only water-based park.

“It’s 100,000 fold what we got for what we spent,” McBride said, speaking of the cost of the event and travel compared to the contacts and information that was shared. “To be able to meet that kind of personnel and put a bug in their ear is priceless.”

Several members of the local group have already begun plans to hold a similar event next year.




northwoods I realize that...

Back to page top

northwoods

I realize that the local politicians are going to washington and living large and partying with congress on we the taxpayers. Has anyone asked how much all this is going to cost us the taxpayer. Answer the questions: How much to we pay per year , per month. Just tell us before november so we can decide with our votes. Why not tell the county env department staffers to do their jobs and regulate the poluters.


Submitted by northwoods on March 17, 2010 - 7:32pm.

It could be more or less...

Back to page top

It could be more or less than a visit to see Rocky and Bullwinkle.


Submitted by kay on March 17, 2010 - 8:12pm.

Obama and Pelosi Staff?...

Back to page top

Obama and Pelosi Staff? hmm.....Should be about as productive as climbing an imaginary rope.


Submitted by shway21 on March 18, 2010 - 5:47am.

Northwoods, partying hard?...

Back to page top

Northwoods, partying hard? We had meetings and discussions from 7am to 10 pm and then, yes, food and drink and sleep. The trip cost "us" taxpayers about $1600 for the city members and about the same for county members and about $300 out of most of our pockets. If you think that we would not take in some of Washingtons sites(3 hours) while we were there baffles me, who wouldn't. Most of the time it was running and meeting, something I challenge any one to do as good as the people who traveled to DC on this matter. I'm not sure about the rest of your question.
Kay, typical cynical comment and 21, we visited members from the other side of the eisle too, as a matter of fact, Andy Burmeister who set this up and stated "this was exteamly rare and successful to get as many members and STAFF as we did get to our presentation," worked for Coleman and has contacts with the likes of my man McCain and others. I do believe we made an impact, and it was a very small price to pay to walk the Halls of Congress and at the minimum pop one's head in offices,like my man McCain, and say hi and why.As far as Jim Oberstar, he is one of the most respected members of Congress and that is evident when ever you mention his name. He is an important portal for local's to use to reach others who make decisions. Also,I'm to fat to climb a rope, real or imaginary. Any further questions you are welcome to call me, I am listed, Chopper.


Submitted by Doorsman 54 on March 18, 2010 - 10:41am.

Actually I think it was a...

Back to page top

Actually I think it was a good idea to go. I support the Park and feel it is the one good thing the area has going for it. The comment was that northwoods was not upset about the CA trip which has none or little benefit to the community but for some people anything to do with the Park makes them mad.


Submitted by kay on March 18, 2010 - 11:03am.

You guys did what good local...

Back to page top

You guys did what good local politicians should do -- get your names, faces, and community concerns known in Washington D. C. One of the great assets we have is a senior congressman like Oberstar who has the ability to move things in our direction. But we've got to seem interested -- Doorsman, ignore the rubes when they act like rubes and congratulate them on the rare occasions when they don't. Good work -- and it was fun to see you on youtube last night. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GkUBwlf4ThI


Submitted by Thomas L. Johnson on March 18, 2010 - 3:54pm.

northwoods The question is...

Back to page top

northwoods

The question is simple: How much is the sewer line going to cost each taxpayer? How much in taxes ? How much in monthly fees? In washington they pushed this sewer line to islandview. Now it won't happen for nothing tell us what the expected charges will be. If no one can tell us now, when can they tell us.


Submitted by northwoods on March 18, 2010 - 7:43pm.

I don't usually get a chance...

Back to page top

I don't usually get a chance to disagree with northwoods, so I relish the chance to ask him: what is it about sewers that is not worth paying for? Imagine that the governments of the past had resisted putting in roads -- that would be a bad thing. Imagine that there was no power up to the lake -- that would make life tough; I know, because we built our cabin without power. Now is the time for number three that every civilized part of the American culture has -- sewer systems. Or is the idea of living in a place like Haiti an attractive one?

It was a good thing that people who had outhouses just a matter of yards away from Rainy Lake now have flushing toilets. In the long run, civilization adds value to an area and the taxpayer argument, while it might hold water when it comes to frivolous expenses, hardly holds water [sorry] when it comes to sanitation -- at least not in our part of the world. Or am I mistaken?


Submitted by Thomas L. Johnson on March 19, 2010 - 3:44am.

Actually, I believe the...

Back to page top

Actually, I believe the outhouse scenario was not as bad as thought: no leaking septic tanks or faulty drain fields, just a nice big hole in the ground, hopefully a respectful distance from the lake.

As for my Rainy Lake abode, it is a composting toilet that produces a rich annual compost harvest already pre-seeded with tomatoes from last year's summer salads.


Submitted by bayside on March 19, 2010 - 2:07pm.

Its all about the cost and...

Back to page top

Its all about the cost and not wanting to pay. Everyone also thinks it is not THEIR sewer that is failing.


Submitted by kay on March 19, 2010 - 6:24am.

Thanks for the comments,...

Back to page top

Thanks for the comments, everyone, even though I gave Kay a bit of a shot I think she?(avatar?)simply throws in something to generate discussion. Northwoods, I am on a sub-committee dealing with the sewer extention. This project runs from Crane Lake to Jackfish. How much would it cost, $11 to $25,000,000. What would it cost a household?, too much without state and federal involvment. Yes, this is still our tax money but I am more than willing to involve California or North Carolina in our efforts to pay for infrastucture for our area as maybe they will use whatever we construct. Again, we can not afford big projects unless they are G.O. bonded or Revenue Bonded and also help again from the state or fed. If this sewer project did go through without help, the cost per month would be in excess of $400.00 per. NOT!!! We do need new systems, if you remember the fights over East Koochiching Sewer districts formation and recently Jackfish' formation, the uproar that caused was huge, now that these are in place people love it, but it does have to be affordable to the property owner, but again, it has to be done for the good of the watershed. Thanks again, we hope our trip has some impact on our town and greater community. And Kay, you are right on, even a new septic system(in ground or mound) is failing right out of the gate, so a central system or closed area spray Irrigation are a couple of the only systems that would work. Chopper


Submitted by Doorsman 54 on March 19, 2010 - 9:49am.

Having grown up without...

Back to page top

Having grown up without running water or sewer I cannot even imagine living like that again. But I do not agree with forcing those whose systems are good to hook up. Having said that at sometime they will all be failing so in the end everyone will need the system. The cost of a mound system is probably more than a central system and they are not the best answer. The size of the new homes in the Gold Shores area must have huge systems and building on rock must make putting in a mound almost impossible. This topic should probably be a new forum.


Submitted by kay on March 19, 2010 - 10:26am.

northwoods Just to close the...

Back to page top

northwoods

Just to close the loop on my question and for the purposes of total clarity: What is the target price for the taxpayer on the new sewer service? What is the price that the commisoners view as OK for us( the taxpayers) to pay. Per resident $_______/month, $_______/tax levy. Tell us what the intentions of the politicians are?


Submitted by northwoods on March 22, 2010 - 8:01pm.

Northwoods, I don't know why...

Back to page top

Northwoods, I don't know why I am answering a question aimed for a county commissioner, as I am not one, I am a city councilor, but I have stayed in a Holiday Inn express once, sorry, I had to. I think if the costs could get in line with what Jackfish people are paying, that may cause the project to proceed. Right now however, the project does not get enough "points"(number of people in the proposed area) to nail down significant federal or state funding. The amount per month per household, if funding became available and paid enough of the project down, the price then may get to about $100 / $150 per month plus $20 to $25 per month usage for collection and treatment per household. How the county would handle the debt service payment and collection of usage would be discussed in length I am sure. That $120 to $175.00 figure may be acceptable to some in the proposed distict. Hope this helps. Chopper


Submitted by Doorsman 54 on March 23, 2010 - 7:47am.

The county board could...

Back to page top

The county board could benefit if one or more of them would come on this site and answer questions. Even use this as a sounding board for projects. It really is a great way to get public opinion good or bad.


Submitted by kay on March 23, 2010 - 8:24am.

They don't want public...

Back to page top

They don't want public input! ! ! They already know everything !
And the people of Koochiching County deserve what they get for re-electing them over and over. So take what you've elected and be happy.


Submitted by curious curt on March 23, 2010 - 3:46pm.

northwoods It would be good...

Back to page top

northwoods

It would be good for a County level Elected official to provide a position. Since it boils down to systems that work and those that don't , why not just determine what systems work and which ones do not. ( The county has an environmental department that can do this. Isn't this their Job?) If a system in use does not work right and meet requirements, give the land owner a given time to fix it or the county will. If the owner does not fix it, the county can and then tax the property for the fix. That way, the owners have personal responsibility for their own systems. At the $200 dollar /month level, the land owner is incented to fix the system or put in a tank. In this time in our nations history, the last thing we need is more big government infringement. Personal responsibility is what makes our county and our country great. The above plan would also cost less to. Do we need our friends and neighbors to pay for our systems. Wealthy business owners can update their systems with pre tax dollars. What is not fair about that? This plan also maintains the existing level of developement. This keeps property prices stable and frankly higher in that the supply does not increase to any great degree.


Submitted by northwoods on March 23, 2010 - 7:17pm.


Recent comments

Advertising

Advertising

Community Events

« September 2010 »
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 442 guests online.

Who's new

  • alehandi
  • Chris Reed Haun
  • duanemac
  • thramerd
  • HuggyKat

Today's Poll


» Read similar stories filed under:


Advertising